Thursday, September 07, 2006

Some Clues to Knowing if You Are a Lefturd.

Well after joyously wandering aimlessly amongst the blogs and "truth detectors" on this wonderful Al Gore invention, I have come up with a couple items to let you, my adoring readers, a system to know if you are veering dangerously close to becoming a lefturd. I know, what a great run-on misguided sentence of intellectual babble. Who cares, it is my blog!

The other day I went over the emaciated brains of "Truthout". The main theme of course, is severe BDS and those evil JOOOS, not to mention .... well anything dealing with decency and common sense (this includes but is not limited to: Christianity, conservatism, gun rights with responsible control, and personal responsibility). Then I spotted this
little jewel of complete and total disregard for any sort of logical thinking and comprehension of world affairs, lest I even mention FACTS. I was blown away by the ignorance and blatant lies from the dysfunctional neuron transmitters of John Mueller. He just comes out and says that there is not actual threat/a very miniscule one from terrorists.
"Despite all the ominous warnings of wily terrorists and imminent attacks, there has been neither a successful strike nor a close call in the United States since 9/11. The reasonable -- but rarely heard -- explanation is that there are no terrorists within the United States, and few have the means or the inclination to strike from abroad."

Ok, now hold here for a second. I cannot honestly say with my redneck damaged thought processes can ever remember such an explanation. Now what I have heard is that due to our security measures that been put into place there have been many attacks avoided and cells broken up both home and abroad. I have heard of communication and support networks being severely damaged, destroyed, and inconvenienced due to the heavy-handed fascist arm called DHS (Department of Homeland Security). Now with the recent arrests and actions of homegrown and immigrated terrorists running people down in the streets, buying cell phones like nickel bubble gum, and of course, all the Hezbollah flags and synagogue cocktails being tossed.... hmm sounds like there are terrorists living within the comfortable confines of our borders.

This brings up another point in this case, the free flowing human wave of aliens across our borders. It has been well documented that those wishing the utter destruction of western civilization are using this weakness. They have a widely known human transportation system from the Latin American countries to funnel not only just drugs, but also arms and people into the US. But oh no, there is not an ever-present threat of terrorism in the US.

The item that is just as grossly convoluted in logic is the up coming ABC special on 9-11. These
wackturds are in such an up roar about this movie, whether it is a docudrama or a real documentary, that they are just foaming at the mouth, eyes, ears, and every other orifice that is capable of such an action, with obvious panic stricken, guilt laden, masturbatory bukake style stupidness as a serious mental meltdown due to BDS. How they are so reactionary to even the slightest mention that their living god is no longer getting some BJ's in the oval office, but is shown that under his impotent (snicker) wisdom had willingly failed to take true action against a true threat to the nation. They are all rallying up and having a weep fest of ignorance that one of their own liberal outlets would show such a thing. Yet last I knew only a few select people have been privy to view this work. Damn isn't this just a schoolyard game. They can spout out that Porky Moore Hamburgers' movie was factual and correct in all its waste of film, but not even wait to see what the other side has to say about the exact some thing. I say they are pussies! Yes the side of progress (Progressives) those that are more tolerant of others' views are unable to progress to let the truth out and be tolerate of the views portrayed within a movie to be aired without charge to those that choose to view it. I guess they fail to understand that the bigger stink they make of it the more people are going to make it a point to watch it. Dumbass lefturds.

So my readers, if you agree with the articles that are linked, then you too are a lefturd.

Here's your sign.


Tags:, , , , , , , , , , , , , Some Clues to Knowing if You Are a Lefturd.


At 9/07/2006 11:57 PM, Blogger Doghouse said...

Referring to leftists as "progressive" is one of the most hilariously insane things I have ever heard. There's nothing "progressive" about them, unless you're talking about things getting "progressively" worse, or "progressively" stupid, or "progressively" stealing money from citizens to fund "progressively" intrusive and immoral social programs.

It's like calling them "liberal." They're only liberal with their morals (as if they had any!) and more particularly, other people's money.

At 9/07/2006 11:58 PM, Blogger Doghouse said...

By the way, the "Here's your sign" reference is perfect.

At 9/08/2006 8:52 AM, Blogger Carnivore said...

yup the slight saracasim and underlying pokes and prodes were just a little evident in this one. A few jabs to the "progressive thought", clintons, and in general all leftists. As I stated, they are all against anything even remotely decent and wish for the perfect utopia of perversion as a rule of day.

I think those that would get "lost" in this entry would only be the leftisits themselves at what I was trying to put out. That is that they are all wankers.

So you enjoyed the pick and of course one of Larry's catch lines too. I took that picture when I was back stateside this past july. It came striaght from the nieghbors pasture too. The wife asked me why I too it. Well after explaining to her why, she just laughed her cute bumm off. We are now trying to decide what bumm to replace it with. Which of course is not a bad job for me condiering I get to look at all sorts of bumms now without fearing the blundt force trauma to my occipital region (my skull) from a swiftly moving metal object (Frying pan). The problem is, J.Lo or Jennifer Ann.

At 9/08/2006 9:36 PM, Blogger Frederick said...

I can't believe those lefturds! Such lies! Everyone knows there have been attacks against America since 911...hello, Anthrax? No one seems to remember that just because the Bush Administration FAILED to capture or prosecute anyone for it. And look at all the success the Administration has had at securing our airports, sea ports, and borders. What are they bitching about?! You’d think the number of terrorist incidents had increased, not decreased since the War in Iraq. What’s up with those libtards in the Senate releasing a report saying al-Qaeda and Iraq didn’t ever have anything to do with each other. I tell ya, they are getting stupider by the day…

At 9/08/2006 10:00 PM, Blogger Carnivore said...

Welcome to my place, sit down and have a steak.

However, you do remember numerous times where I had provided links to you proving the documents and personal testimony about the links of al-qeada and Iraq, or perhaps you have forgotten them once more. If so do go back to the archives at MSN on my place, and also Mrs. Carnivore's as well. You will find them.

As for the lack of security, I agree there is a serious lack of security on the borders. The free ticket immigration plan sucks a sucks arse too. Both sides are lacking the balls to tend to this seriously even after the threat has been outlined and presneted clear as day. As for air security... it is a little tighter than what is has been in the years prior (and I do probably do more international travel than you for this comparision), yet could still be better. Not only stateside, but abroad too.

The anthrax attacks are a pain in the neck for all. As you pointed out, there has not been any prosecutions for them ... and why? A failure that noen should forget regardless of the administration.

How's your training coming along?

At 9/08/2006 11:47 PM, Blogger Frederick said...

Senate reports say Saddam rejected cooperating with terrorists
By Warren P. Strobel and Margaret Talev
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON - Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein rejected pleas for assistance from Osama bin Laden and tried to capture terrorist Abu Musab al Zarqawi when he was in Iraq, a Senate Intelligence Committee report released Friday found, casting further doubt on the Bush administration's rationale for invading Iraq.

President Bush and other administration officials repeatedly cited Saddam's alleged ties to radical Islamic terrorists before the March 2003 invasion as one reason to take military action against Iraq.

The 150-page report said the administration's claims were untrue. "Postwar findings indicate that Saddam Hussein was distrustful of al-Qaida and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al-Qaida to provide material or operational support," the report said.

The report was released along with a second one that said false information from the exile group Iraqi National Congress, led by Ahmad Chalabi, was widely distributed in prewar intelligence reports and used to support intelligence assessments about Iraq's weapons and links to terrorism. Intelligence officials repeatedly warned that the INC was unreliable, but White House and Pentagon officials ignored the warnings.

At 9/10/2006 10:37 AM, Blogger Carnivore said...

Thanks for a copy and paste of an article here. But what are YOUR thoughts on the subject. Surly you have some of your own. I am positive that even after there has been evidence that has shown positive connections to terrorist groups , including ties to Al-Qeada, that even with your mind you can see that this is flawed at best, and false and worst. Surely you remebe those documents recovered from the former government there showing clearly this, documents from A-stan as well. The numerous gifts to the dead suicide bombers, the training camps.

Shouldn't the authrs/researchers of said report be ashamed of themselves for ignoring these facts in making such a falsified report. It is people like these (regardless of which of the ailse they are) that hamper the security and military to do their jobs. This is not well for the country and you are obviously touting this report like it is some kind golden bullet that will shoot the big bad wolf. The question is, do you want such incompetant people in power that will ignore such facts that we have availible considering the threats to our very existence? Do you support this report as complete truth?

What is is Fred? As a troop serving your country, having been on duty for homeland security, you ought to question the reasons behind this farse of a repot. You need question the motives behind the authors, and the material used. Really, I expected more out of you then just this.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home